The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus

By Stephan Lewandowsky
Professor, School of Experimental Psychology and Cabot Institute, University of Bristol
Posted on 29 October 2012
Filed under Cognition

The embargo on my latest paper on the cognition of climate change, published in Nature Climate Change, has now been lifted. The paper and abstract are available using the doi: 10.1038/10.1038/NCLIMATE1720.

The paper is entitled “The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science”, and its abstract reads as follows:

Although most experts agree that CO2 emissions are causing anthropogenic global warming (AGW), public concern has been declining. One reason for this decline is the ‘manufacture of doubt’ by political and vested interests, which often challenge the existence of the scientific consensus. The role of perceived consensus in shaping public opinion is therefore of considerable interest: in particular, it is unknown whether consensus determines people’s beliefs causally. It is also unclear whether perception of consensus can override people’s ‘worldviews’, which are known to foster rejection of AGW. Study 1 shows that acceptance of several scientific propositions—from HIV/AIDS to AGW—is captured by a common factor that is correlated with another factor that captures perceived scientific consensus. Study 2 reveals a causal role of perceived consensus by showing that acceptance of AGW increases when consensus is highlighted. Consensus information also neutralizes the effect of worldview.

There are a number of interesting aspects to the results, and I am highlighting three that I find particularly noteworthy or intriguing.

The first one is the finding that people’s attitudes towards science are a mixture of specific opinions (i.e., how much people endorse climate science or the link between tobacco and lung cancer) as well as a general factor (i.e., how much people endorse scientific propositions in general). This is quite interesting because it means that there is something about science in general that (partially) determines people’s acceptance of scientific propositions about issues as diverse as tobacco, HIV, and climate.

We furthermore showed that this general factor capturing acceptance of science was correlated with another general factor that represented perceived consensus among scientists. That is, the public’s views on science are at least partially driven by the extent to which people perceive agreement among scientists.

This correlation is neither surprising nor entirely new, as other researchers have reported similar results for climate science (although no one has previously reported the involvement of a general factor). It also explains why climate deniers expend considerable effort to negate the existence of that consensus, using the usual array of deceptive techniques such as pseudo-experts, or pointing to unreviewed blog-posts as “evidence” for their contrarian positions.

The second intriguing finding is that when people were explicitly informed about the scientific consensus on climate change, they became significantly more likely to endorse the basic premise of global warming, and they attributed a larger share of the observed warming trend to human CO2 emissions, than people in a control condition who received no such information. This result suggests that consensus information causally contributes to people’s acceptance of scientific propositions.

The final intriguing finding was that the effect of the consensus information was particularly effective for people whose “free-market” worldview predisposed them to reject climate science. It has long been known that personal ideology or “worldview” is a major driver of people’s attitudes towards climate change: the more strongly people endorse a “fundamentalist” view of the free market, the more likely they are to reject climate science. The role of worldview presents a formidable challenge to science communicators because ideology may override any factual information. Worse yet, the provision of factual information may lead to “backfire” effects that reduce—rather than enhance—acceptance of science among people with extreme worldviews.

The fact that in our study, the provision of consensus information attenuated the role of worldview and increased acceptance particularly among people who maximally endorsed the free market may therefore present an avenue to overcome the communication challenge faced by climate scientists.

Bookmark and Share


Comments 1 to 17:

  1. Dana Nuccitelli at 10:46 AM on 29 October, 2012
    Congrats on the paper Stephan. Great timing too, I've got a post on the importance of consensus coming up at Skeptical Science this week. I've linked your paper and this blog post.
  2. I found this is an informative and interesting post so i think so it is very useful and knowledgeable. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article.
    facebook auto liker
    youtube views
  3. You know your projects stand out of the herd. There is something special about them. It seems to me all of them are really brilliant!
    hochzeit musik dj
  4. japan.comp234 at 20:23 PM on 6 October, 2015
    Thank you for helping people get the information they need. Great stuff as usual. Keep up the great work!!!
    things to do in phuket
  5. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly that love and read more on this topic. If possible, such as gain knowledge, would you mind updating your blog with additional information? It is very useful for me.
    electrical contractors Birmingham
  6. very interesting keep posting.
    Social Video Consultant Review
  7. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. Thanks...
    how much are dental implants
  8. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commentators here!
    ScaleSocial Review
  9. Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here...
    amazing selling machine review
  10. I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
    Build My List 2.0 review
  11. Your website is really cool and this is a great inspiring article.
    Commission Gorilla
  12. japan.comp234 at 23:34 PM on 5 November, 2015
    I am hoping the same best effort from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing skills has inspired me. free twitter followers youtube subscribers
  13. i am for the first time here. I found this board and I in finding It truly helpful & it helped me out a lot. I hope to present something back and help others such as you helped me.
    backlink generator
  14. This one is good. keep up the good work!..
    ecom premier academy review
  15. Im no expert, but I believe you just made an excellent point. You certainly fully understand what youre speaking about, and I can truly get behind that.
  16. This is really a nice and informative, containing all information and also has a great impact on the new technology. Thanks for sharing it
  17. I high value this post. It's elusive the great from the awful in some cases, yet I think you've nailed it! would you brain redesigning your website with more data? Technology News
Comments Policy

Post a Comment

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or register a new account.