Unexpected connections: Income inequality and environmental degradation

By Jaqueline Haupt
Posted on 13 February 2012
Filed under Economic Equity, Politics
and Carmen Lawrence
Winthrop Professor, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia

Ensuring that natural resources are consumed and waste is produced at sustainable rates represent major contemporary challenges. Recognition of these challenges resulted in the endorsement in 2000 of environmental sustainability as one of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to be achieved by 2015. However, by 2003 global rates of consumption and waste production were estimated to be at least 25% higher than the capacity of the planet to provide resources and absorb waste (Kitzes, et al., 2007) and this rate may have risen as high as 50% by 2007 (WWF, 2010). A vital aspect of achieving sustainability is widespread social change, yet the current theoretical knowledge of societal transformation processes is limited. In order to improve nations’ environmental performance, a better understanding of socioeconomic and behavioural forces driving such unsustainable development is required.

There is general agreement that economic growth, as measured by per capita national income, affects environmental quality (Constatini & Martini, 2010). Papanyotou (1994) has described this relationship by an inverted U-shape curve (the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC)). From this perspective, as the economy expands, environmental damage increases up to a threshold, above which the society demands and can afford environmental remediation and natural resource protection. However, research into the extent to which the EKC succeeds in describing the relationship between economic growth and environmental damage has produced conflicting results. Shafik (1994), for example, found that a number of variables vary monotonically with income – and in different directions; some, such as access to safe water and sanitation show improvement, while others, such as CO2 emissions and waste generation indicate deterioration. There is evidence that the richest countries’ carbon emissions and resource consumption are continuing to increase beyond sustainable levels (Moran, et al., 2008) and some developing countries appear to perform better, environmentally speaking, than developed ones (Emerson et al., 2010). It appears that economic growth may not be ultimately or necessarily beneficial (Lawn & Clarke, 2010; Magnani, 2000) and that other factors make a major contribution to environmental outcomes. In particular, it appears that income distribution rather than average levels of income may be a critical determinant of environmental degradation (Jun et al., 2011).

Income inequality has been extensively correlated with health and social problems: life expectancy, obesity, mental health, drug use, educational performance, teenage births and violence to name a few (Wilkinson & Pickett, 2010). Environmental degradation appears to be another side effect of economic inequality and analyses show there is a negative correlation between income inequality and environmental sustainability (Andrich et al., 2010; Baland et al., 2007; Butler, 2002; Dorling, 2010a, 2010b; Holland et al., 2009; Mikkelson et al., 2007): the higher the income inequality the worse the environmental indicators such as waste production, meat and water consumption, biodiversity loss and environmental composite indices (e.g. ecological footprint).

While research on the relationship between inequality and various social and environmental indicators is extensive, the pathways and mechanisms underlying these linkages are yet to be established. It may be, as Coburn (2004) has argued, that income inequality is itself the result of the basic social, political and economic characteristics of a given society which also affect the quality of the environment. Characteristics such as the prevailing economic ideologies, cultural values like individualism and materialism, as well as attitudes toward consumption, work and the importance of protecting the environment are all likely to influence national policies which affect both income distribution and environmental quality. Breznau’s (2010) analysis of survey data from five countries showed that those with egalitarian values are the most likely to support government services designed to reduce inequality. Conversely, those who support “economic individualism”[1] and neo-liberal economic policies are the least likely to favour such a role for government (Arikan, 2011). Such attitudes also appear to affect support for pro-environmental behaviours and expenditures. Generally speaking, those who hold pro-market/ individualist worldviews do not endorse pro- environmental values and behaviours; the reverse holds true for people who maintain pro-environmental values (Heath & Gifford, 2006; Steg & Sievers, 2000). Significantly, for understanding the relationship between inequality and environmental degradation, these values appear to be reflected in actual government expenditure; countries which have higher scores on “economic individualism” have lower levels of overall government spending per capita (Arikan, 2011).

Arguing from an economic perspective, Magnani (2000) has speculated that income inequality reduces pro-environmental public spending via a ‘relative income effect’ which causes shifts in the preferences of those with below average incomes in favour of greater consumption of private goods instead of public ones. Using data on public expenditure on environmental protection between 1980 and 1992 in 19 OECD countries, she showed that wider income inequalities were associated with lower environmental expenditure.

Alternatively, Wilkinson and Pickett (2010) argue that inequality heightens consumerism that makes it harder to contain economic activity within sustainable levels and show evidence from a number of sources on savings, debt, bankruptcy rates, spending on advertising and working hours that indicate that inequality does increase the pressure to consume. According to Wilkinson and Pickett, two mechanisms can be identified by which social inequality leads to greater consumerism: (1) people in more unequal societies are more stressed and anxious, and consumption provides a way for  people to escape from those pressures, and (2) the consumption by the rich reduces everyone else’s satisfaction with what they have, by showing it up as inferior, as less than the best; a great deal of what drives consumption is status competition, which, intuitively, is more intense in unequal societies.

Boyce et al (2007) have proposed that the unequal distribution of wealth and power within countries leads to greater environmental damage by undermining the collective action required for environmental protection. Likewise, it has been shown that more equal societies are more socially cohesive and have higher levels of trust which foster public-spiritedness (Wilkinson & Pickett, 2010). Similar findings have been reported on the relationship between social capital and environmental outcomes (Dulal et al., 2011), presumably because lack of trust and poorer social capital erode the capacity for collaborative action.

It is possible that by inducing lower expenditure on environmental protection, increasing consumerism or reducing collective action, economic inequality may affect nations’ environment performance. To date, there has been a lack of empirical analyses establishing the potential causal links between income inequality and environmental degradation.  We are currently undertaking research which we hope will fill in some of these gaps in our understanding.


Andrich, M. A., Imberger, J., & Oxburgh, E. R. (2010). Raising Utility and Lowering Risk through Adaptive Sustainability: Society and Wealth Inequity in Western Australia. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(3), 14-35.

Arikan, G. (2011). Economic Individualism and Government Spending. World Values Research, 4(3), 73-95.

Baland, J.-M., Bardan, P., & Bowles, S. (Eds.). (2007). Inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Boyce, J. K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 11(1994), 169-178.

Boyce, J. K., Klemer, A. R., Templet, P. H., & Willis, C. E. (1999). Power distribution, the environment, and public health: A state-level analysis. Ecological Economics, 29(1999), 127–140.

Boyce, J. K., Narain, S., & Stanton, E. A. (Eds.). (2007). Reclaiming nature: environmental justice and ecological restoration. London: Athem Press.

Breznau, N. (2010). Economic Equality and Social Welfare: Policy Preferences in Five Nations International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(4), 458-484.

Butler, C. D. (2002). Inequality and Sustainability. Doctoral thesis, Australian National University, Canberra. Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/46233 

Coburn, D. (2004). Beyond the income inequality hypothesis: class, neo-liberalism, and health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine, 58(2004), 41–56.

Constatini, V., & Martini, C. (2010). A Modified Environmental Kuznets Curve for sustainable development assessment using panel data. Int. J. Global Environmental Issues, 10(1/2), 84-122.  

Dorling, D. (2010a). Is more equal more green? London: University of Sheffield.

Dorling, D. (2010b). Social Inequality and Environmental Justice. Environmental Scientist, 19(3), 9-13.

Dulal, H. B., Foa, R., & Knowles, S. (2011). Social Capital and Cross-Country Environmental Performance. Journal of Environment & Development, 20(2), 121–144.

Emerson, J., Levy, M., Esty, D. C., Kim, C., Mara, V., & Srebotnjak, T. (2010). 2010 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.

Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation : The Case of Belief in Global Climate Change. Environment and Behaviour, 38(1), 48-71.

Holland, T. G., Peterson, G. D., & Gonzalez, A. (2009). A Cross-National Analysis of How Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss. Conservation Biology, 23(5), 1304-13013.

Jun, Y., Zhong-kui, Y., & Peng-fei, S. (2011). Income Distribution, Human Capital and Environmental Quality: Empirical Study in China. Energy Procedia, 5(2011), 1689–1696.

Lawn, P., & Clarke, M. (2010). The end of economic growth? A contracting threshold hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 69(2010), 2213–2223.

Magnani, E. (2000). The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution. Ecological Economics, 32(2000), 431-443.

Moran, D. D., Wackernagel, M., Kitzes, J. A., Goldfinger, S. H., & Boutaud, A. (2008). Measuring sustainable development — Nation by nation. Ecological Economics, 64, 470-474.

Mikkelson, G. M., Gonzalez, A., & Peterson, G. D. (2007). Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss. PLoS ONE, 2(5), e444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000444

Pandit, R., & Laband, D. N. (2009). Economic well-being, the distribution of income and species imperilment. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18(2009), 3219-3233.

Papanyotou, T. (1994). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Pacific and Asian Journal of Energy, 4(1), 23-42.

Shafik, N. (1994). Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(1994), 757-773.

Steg, L., & Sievers, I. (2000). Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environment and Behaviour, 32(2), 250-269.

Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.

WWF International. (2010) Living planet report 2010. Gland: WWF International.  Retrieved September 29, 2011, from http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications/living_planet_report/



[1] economic individualism—a cultural orientation that emphasizes the values of individual autonomy, self-reliance, and achievement and is associated with support for capitalism and laissez faire market economics and preference for a limited role of government in the economy

Bookmark and Share


1  2  Next

Comments 1 to 50 out of 61:

  1. Thanks for the blog loaded with so many information. Stopping by your blog helped me to get what I was looking for.
    clash of clans hack ios
  2. I admire what you have done here. I like the part where you say you are doing this to give back but I would assume by all the comments that this is working for you as well.
    auto like facebook photo
    youtube views increaser
  3. This is very educational content and written well for a change. It's nice to see that some people still understand how to write a quality post!
    hochzeit musik dj
  4. I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.
  5. I havent any word to appreciate this post.....Really i am impressed from this post....the person who create this post it was a great human..thanks for shared this with us.
    publish academy review
  6. Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here...
    please visit
  7. I really thank you for the valuable info on this great subject and look forward to more great posts. Thanks a lot for enjoying this beauty article with me. I am appreciating it very much! Looking forward to another great article. Good luck to the author! All the best!
    Venus Factor Review
  8. This blog is really great. The information here will surely be of some help to me. Thanks!.
    iherb rewards code 2015
  9. Nice way of using the referencing system. It is awesome to combine so good information into a single article, hack clash of clans.
  10. Your website is really cool and this is a great inspiring article.
    hajj packages
  11. Thanks for sharing this information. I really like your blog post very much. You have really shared a informative and interesting blog post with people..
  12. this is really nice to read..informative post is very good to read..thanks a lot!
    Profit Canvas Review
  13. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.
  14. Interesting topic for a blog. I have been searching the Internet for fun and came upon your website. Fabulous post. Thanks a ton for sharing your knowledge! It is great to see that some people still put in an effort into managing their websites. I'll be sure to check back again real soon.
    Fresh Title
  15. very interesting keep posting.
    sony over the ear headphones
  16. I just found this blog and have high hopes for it to continue. Keep up the great work, its hard to find good ones. I have added to my favorites. Thank You.
    Scale Social Review
  17. Thank you for taking the time to publish this information very useful!
    amazing selling machine review
  18. I was reading your article and wondered if you had considered creating an ebook on this subject. Your writing would sell it fast. You have a lot of writing talent.
    Build My List 2.0 review
  19. Thank you very much for this great post.
  20. This is actually the kind of information I have been trying to find. Thank you for writing this information.
    money exchange
  21. I read that Post and got it fine and informative. Please share more like that...
    Commission Gorilla
  22. Excellent read, Positive site, where did u come up with the information on this posting?I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style. Thanks a million and please keep up the effective work. how to hack whatsapp
  23. Thank you very much for the sharing! COOL..
    exhibition stand design
  24. Thanks for another wonderful post. Where else could anybody get that type of info in such an ideal way of writing?
    new ration card delhi
  25. Friend, this web site might be fabolous, i just like it.
    backlink generator
  26. Thanks for the post and great tips..even I also think that hard work is the most important aspect of getting success..
    ecom premier academy review
  27. ashikaverma2671 at 05:13 AM on 14 November, 2015
    I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style. Thanks a million and please keep up the effective work.
    Monster Strike Hack
  28. Wow, wonderful weblog layout! How long have you ever been blogging for?
    you make blogging glance easy. The full look of your website
    is excellent, as neatly as the content material! GTA 5 triche illimitee
  29. Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Big thanks for the useful info.
  30. http://www.shapingtomorrowsworld.org/Debunking-Handbook-now-freely-available-download.htmlserrurier lyon
  31. Great! It sounds good. Thanks for sharing..
    best online marketing websites
  32. Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Big thanks for the useful info.
  33. most people does not use the natural resources well.click here

  34. The website is looking bit flashy and it catches the visitors eyes. Design is pretty simple and a good user friendly interface.
    good morning sms
  35. Thanks you very much for sharing these links. Will definitely check this out..
    SGX Cat
  36. I really appreciate this wonderful post that you have provided for us. I assure this would be beneficial for most of the people.
    see more
  37. amsbosstoolsmobi at 23:23 PM on 10 December, 2015
    We are really grateful for your blog post. Great work !!
    angel investors india
  38. Thanks for sharing the info, keep up the good work going.... I really enjoyed exploring your site. good resource...
    natural foods to increase breast milk
  39. Thanks, that was a really cool read!
    Elite eCom Masterclass review
  40. I read that Post and got it fine and informative.
    anunturi tara galilor
  41. I'm glad I found this web site, I couldn't find any knowledge on this matter prior to.Also operate a site and if you are ever interested in doing some visitor writing for me if possible feel free to let me know, im always look for people to check out my web site.
    homeowners insurance by state
  42. The situation can be changed if it is analyzed as it should from those people. Get more instagram followers free.
  43. Great Article it its really informative and innovative keep us posted with new updates. its was really valuable. thanks a lot. mleko nan ulewanie
  44. Your website is really cool and this is a great inspiring article.

    mleko nan pro ha 1 opinie
  45. Positive site, where did u come up with the information on this posting?I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style. Thanks a million and please keep up the effective work. szklo w nestle
  46. Interesting topic for a blog. I have been searching the Internet for fun and came upon your website. Fabulous post. Thanks a ton for sharing your knowledge! It is great to see that some people still put in an effort into managing their websites. I'll be sure to check back again real soon.
    mom w sloiczkach
  47. I read that Post and got it fine and informative.

    romani in uk
  48. amsbosstoolsmobi at 18:42 PM on 19 December, 2015
    We are really grateful for your blog post. Great work !!
    Angel Investors India
  49. amsbosstoolsmobi at 21:48 PM on 21 December, 2015
    I really love the quality writing as offered on this post, cheers to the writer.
    Buy high pr backlinks
  50. I high appreciate this post. It’s hard to find the good from the bad sometimes, but I think you’ve nailed it! would you mind updating your blog with more information?
    anunturi united kingdom

1  2  Next

Comments Policy

Post a Comment

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or register a new account.