Ecological Footprint Analysis and Obesity

By Glenn Albrecht
Posted on 11 May 2011
Filed under Carbon Reduction, Disease Control

Modern humans have rapidly changed the conditions that were prevalent during their emergence as a species some 200,000 years ago. For tens of thousands of years humans lived within the constraints of their bioregions and made adaptive adjustments to climatic and biophysical changes. Within the last 10,000 years, humans have successfully colonised nearly every type of ecosystem and bioregion on the planet.

The main source of energy available to humans within this evolutionary context was ‘people power’, the energy gained from the food hunted and gathered within given bioregions. The effort needed to gather essential nutrients for life roughly equalled the energy gained from such enterprise. As a consequence, human ecology lived within the thermodynamic constraints of place and human health in all of its dimensions was an expression of such limitations (Boyden, 1999).

However, as human cultural, agricultural and technological evolution proceeded, the ability to leapfrog the limitations of place grew exponentially. Surpluses in food production, and later, virtually every form of productive capacity, has been associated with a number of problems with the human-nature relationship. Homo sapiens has moved from a local patch disturbing species (Rees, 2000) to a species that now disturbs not only the biosphere, but also the global atmosphere. The human health impacts of such a transition have been well-documented (McKewon, 1988; Boyden, 1999; McMichael, 2001). The so-called ‘diseases of affluence’ such as heart disease, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and some forms of cancer have emerged within a post scarcity society (Hetzel and McMichael, 1987). Overriding all of this is global warming and climate change where potentially irreversible, catastrophic impacts are possible for ecosystem and human health (physical and mental) at a planetary scale (Aron and Patz, 2001; McMichael, 2001; Albrecht, et al 2007).

Ecological Footprint Analysis

Ecological Footprint Analysis (EFA) has been developed as a relatively new tool to assess the impact and sustainability of humans on planet earth (Wackernagel and Rees, 1996; Lenzen and Murray, 2001; WWF Living Planet Report, Global Footprint Network). EFA differs from other measures of human impacts in that it offers a comparative insight into aggregate resource consumption and waste production at a number of different scales. By converting all forms of resource consumption and waste assimilation into a universal unit of biologically productive land (hectares per person) needed to produce those resource and waste assimilation services, meaningful comparisons can be made between the resource intensity of lifestyles worldwide.

What is interesting about EFA is that, in general, it shows that people in rich countries (also those with high per capita use of fossil fuels), generally have the largest Ecological Footprint (EF). This information, combined with other data generated on the health problems of humans, gives us some compelling information about just how intimately the ecological footprint, health status, lifestyle and sustainability are connected. Using publicly available data from the WWF in their Living Planet Report 2010 and the World Health Organisation data on obesity it is possible to see more clearly this connection.

I have put into Table 1 (below) data on some of the largest and smallest national per person ecological footprints in the world and their corresponding rates of obesity for females. The ecological footprint for Nauru has not been calculated. The measure of obesity is body mass index (BMI) where, according to the WHO as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in metres (kg/m2 ). A BMI over 25 kg/m2 is defined as overweight, and a BMI of over 30 kg/m2 as obese (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/ ).

Table 1 also shows how an estimate of a ‘fair earth share’ of available resources can be illustrated. Current best estimates are that given the amount of biologically productive land available on this earth, plus the land needed to assimilate wastes such as carbon dioxide, there is approximately two hectares of land per person if all 7.0 billion people on earth were to have an equal share of biologically productive and useful land. The data also show that a number of countries have ecological footprints near 10 hectares per person which translates into approximately 3-4 planets worth of biologically productive land if universalised.


 

A Heavy Footprint and Health

While I do not wish to argue that there is a simple causal relationship between per person EF and obesity levels expressed as BMI, it is clear that countries with a high EF generally also have a high percentage of people with a BMI defined by the WHO as obese. The converse is also immediately obvious in countries with a very small EF. People in the Pacific Island nations defy this trend in that they have, in, for example, Nauru , about 80% of the female population clinically defined as obese, yet traditionally they had a national ecological footprint that was hardly measurable. However, studies undertaken on obesity in the Pacific suggest that rather than caused primarily by genes or a traditional cultural preference for largeness, clinically defined obesity is a new problem connected to the importation and consumption of high fat and energy dense food, increased use of technology, abandonment of food production and with all of the above, decreased physical activity (Obesity in the Pacific [PDF]).

When the major components of the ecological footprint are broken down it is clear that one of the largest segments is that contributed by food inputs and outputs. The net result of populations (or segments of populations) that over consume food and nutrition while at the same time reducing their physical activity levels is increasing obesity (with attendant chronic disease), an ever increasing ecological footprint and non-sustainability.

Reducing our ecological footprint is vital for planetary and human health. The cheap (until Peak Oil) and freely available energy in a fossil fuel based economy is now, ironically embodied in humans in the form of obesity. In effect, humans are eating fossil hydrocarbon energy and converting their ‘high-hydrocarb’ diet to body fat.

The connections between a high-hydrocarb diet, obesity and climate change may not seem immediately obvious; however, they both produce unfortunate consequences for the health of people and the planet.

References

Aron, J., and Patz, J. (eds) (2001) Ecosystem Change and Public Health: A Global Perspective, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press.

Albrecht, G. (2005). Solastalgia: A new concept in human health and identity. PAN: Philosophy Activism Nature (3), 41-55.

Albrecht, G, Sartore, G et. al. (2007) Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change, Australasian Psychiatry. Vol. 15, Special Supplement, pp. 95-98.

Boyden, S. (1987) Western Civilization in Biological Perspective: Patterns in Biohistory, New York, Oxford University Press.

Hetzel, B., and McMichael, T. (1987) The LS Factor: Lifestyle and Health, Ringwood, Penguin.

Lenzen, M., and Murray, S. (2001). A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecological Economics 37(2): 229-255.

Living Planet Report 2010 (WWF). http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications/living_planet_report/ (accessed May 9 2011)

McKeown, T. (1988) The Origins of Human Disease, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

McMichael, T. (2001) Human frontiers, environments and disease, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Obesity in the Pacific http://www.wpro.who.int/publications/pub_9822039255.htm (accessed May 9 2011)

Rees, W. (2000) Patch Disturbance, Ecofootprints, and Biological Integrity: Revisiting the Limits to Growth (or Why Industrial Society Is Inherently Unsustainable) in Pimental, D. et al Ecological Integrity: Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health, Washington, D.C. Island Press, pp. 139 – 156.

Wackernagel, M and Rees, W (1996) Our Ecological Footprint, Gabriola Island, New Society Publishers.

WHO 2010 https://apps.who.int/infobase/Comparisons.aspx/ (accessed May 9 2011)

Bookmark and Share

135 Comments


Comments 1 to 21:

  1. Very interesting article. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. I got a lot of information .. I am looking forward for more updates from you. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!

    purchase soundcloud downloads
  2. hannakimmi at 11:58 AM on 19 May, 2015
    I was looking for this kind of information and I had enjoyed reading this one. Keep posting. Thanks for sharing.
    --silicone muffin liners
  3. hannakimmi at 12:02 PM on 19 May, 2015
    CLICK HERE NOW ! silicone cups
  4. here are the link to brave frontier cheat that can give you the webpage for getting gems and coins.
  5. I have read your article and it's so helpful. Very interesting. So informative and I enjoyed reading it! Thanks for sharing it! Do more post and new article!

    buy instagram likes
  6. Get it from here free blitz brigade coins and diamonds cheats absolutely free.
  7. I really appreciate this wonderful post that you have provided for us. I assure this would be beneficial for most of the people. Looking forward to read more of your post and updates in the future. buy vine followers cheap
  8. whitewesley87 at 17:34 PM on 31 October, 2015
    This is feasible publish with amazed analysis as an example of it. Nice Topic
    Women Kurti
  9. amsbosstoolsmobi at 21:48 PM on 24 December, 2015
    You have a very inspiring way of exploring and sharing thoughts. Really Motivating.
    Fundraising platforms India
  10. sandmakercrusher at 13:26 PM on 17 January, 2016
    This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality.
    www.sandmakercrusher.com
  11. amsbosstoolsmobi at 21:06 PM on 18 January, 2016
    Thank you, I've been seeking for info about this subject matter for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far.
    webseobuy
  12. If you can provide original how to get followers twitter content for others to share, (that links back to your business, website, products or services), then you are buy twitter followers no password ahead from the outset.
  13. For example, did you know that how to increase twitter followers fast over 80% of pins are repins on Pinterest? That means that 80% of information is “shared” and only 20% of content posted up is how to get more followers twitter original.
  14. Be the 20% that gets repinned where can i buy twitter followers by 80% of users, by creating your own original content!Here are some ways you can create your own original content by investing in the creation of original visual images that you can share on how to get easy followers on twitter social media.
  15. These do not need to be fancy buy twitter followers 5 or expensive. Keep the focus on “original”.Get some in-house training in basic editing buy twitter followers fast for your team.
  16. You will be rewarded with get new twitter followers productivity and cost-savings when you and your team can create and edit your own images get twitter followers free and fast for use online.
  17. I got what you mean , a debt of gratitude is in order for posting .Woh I am upbeat to discover this site through google. steroids for sale at www.steroidscenter.com
  18. I found lots of interesting information here.Great work
    Thanks for the share loved reading the article, please do share more like this wiht us .
    Subway Surfers
    Temple Run 2
    Run 3
    Click Jogos
  19. Great post ! I am actually getting ready to across this information, is very helpful my friend. Also great blog here with all of the valuable information you have. Keep up the good work you are doing here. Harsh
Comments Policy

Post a Comment

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or register a new account.